Home
About INCTR
Organization
Programs
INCTR AWARDS
Membership
Meetings
Newsletter
Publications
Helping
Helping
inctr contact us
inctr
publications

Articles

Oncology, Pain Relief and Government

The World Health Organization (WHO) says that most pain due to cancer could be relieved using a simple analgesic approach, i.e., oral morphine, and that every national government should institute a cancer pain relief program.(1) The WHO analgesic method has also been endorsed for relief of pain due to HIV/AIDS.(2) The method depends on opioid availability and patient access to essential opioid medicines. Recognizing that opioids are controlled strictly as narcotic drugs because of a potential for abuse and drug dependence, WHO recommended that governments (a) evaluate their drug control policies and practices to ensure that patients receive the opioid medications that are necessary for pain relief, and (b) encourage health care workers to report to the appropriate authorities any instance in which oral opioids are not available for cancer patients.

Indeed, the fact that opioids are narcotic drugs regulated by governments is why those interested in pain relief and palliative care for HIV/AIDS and cancer must learn about the drug regulatory system and prepare to work with governments.

The World Health Assembly and the United Nations (UN) Economic and Social Council have become concerned about disparities in availability and patient access to medications such as morphine (Table 1). These UN bodies have adopted resolutions aimed at improving the availability of essential opioid medications for pain relief, especially in low- and middle-income countries.(3,4) The WHO has also published guidelines for improving the availability of opioid analgesics in the world, entitled “Achieving Balance in National Opioids Control Policy: Guidelines for Assessment.” This document provides 16 guidelines that should be used by governments and health professionals in all countries to assess the national opioids control policies and the administration of such policies in order to determine whether they contain the necessary provisions and procedures and promote the required level of cooperation necessary to ensure the availability of opioid analgesics. The guidelines are based on the international legal and medical principle of balance i.e, that efforts to prevent drug abuse and diversion must not interfere with the adequate availability of opioid analgesics for pain relief.

These Guidelines are available in 22 languages, including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, English, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Lithuanian, Mongolian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swahili, Tagalog, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese, and can be accessed through the Pain & Policy Studies Group website at http://www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/publicat/00whoabi/00whoabi.htm

As a World Health Organization Collaborating Center, the Pain & Policy Studies Group (PPSG) at the University of Wisconsin has been working in many parts of the world, including India, Italy, Romania and Africa, using the Guidelines to develop effective methods of identifying and overcoming barriers to opioid availability.

India: PPSG assisted palliative care experts and national and state governments to identify regulatory barriers to the availability of opioid analgesics for use in palliative care. National and state policies have begun to change and the long decline in morphine use has been reversed in some areas; there has been little or no morphine abuse or diversion. See published articles: http://www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/publicat/02jpsm3/index.htm;; http://www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/publicat/01lancet/contents.htm;

Italy: PPSG assisted the Ministry of Health to identify barriers to opioid availability, culminating in new legislation and drug registration procedures, new and previously unavailable medications were added to the list of reimbursable drugs and funds were provided for physician education and public awareness about cancer pain management. For further details, see: http://www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/publicat/03ejcc/index.htm

Romania: Collaborative efforts have identified and removed regulatory barriers to the modern medical use of opioid analgesics for cancer and AIDS; the Ministry of Health approved proposed regulations and implemented a new law that was adopted by the Romanian parliament late in 2005. For details, see: www.painpolicy.wisc.edu/publicat/06lancet/index.htm

Africa: PPSG is partnering with the African Palliative Care Association and others to sponsor regional workshops for teams of health professionals and drug regulators from Sub-Saharan African countries; the teams use the WHO Guidelines to develop action plans for improving national policy. See: http://www.apca.co.ug/advocacy/workshop/index.htm

Mind the Gap

Experts in oncology and palliative care are familiar with the gap between what is known about pain relief, and what pain relief is actually offered. Another gap is becoming apparent: the gap between the need to relieve severe pain in millions of patients and the unavailability of opioids to most of the world’s population. This gap is not due to inadequate supply of opioids — the answer is not to calculate how much is needed and then simply provide it to each country. Rather, the unavailability of opioids is due to the inadequate demand for opioids on the part of physicians who fail to prescribe them for their patients’ pain. The reasons behind the weak demand are rooted in factors with which we are all familiar: lack of awareness about pain relief; reluctance to prescribe opioids because pain relief is not a priority, or lack of knowledge about pain and opioids; regulatory restrictions or drug costs that impede availability and patient care, and exaggerated fears of addiction.

PPSG is developing new resources in international pain policy for health care professionals and governments, including an International Pain Policy Fellowship, an internet course and increased technical assistance and collaboration. There is evidence that the barriers can be identified and removed if health professionals work systematically with government. But there is a long way to go.

David Joranson
University of Wisconsin
Wisconsin, USA

References:

(1) World Health Organization. Cancer pain relief. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1986. http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/

(2) World Health Organization HIV-AIDS. Palliative Care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/palliative/care/en/

(3) World Health Assembly. Cancer Prevention and Control. WHA 58.22 Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005. http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA58-REC1/english/A58_2005_REC1-en.pdf

(4) United Nations Economic and Social Council. Treatment of pain using opioid analgesics; Resolution 2005-25. Report on the forty-eighth session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs E/2005/28; 19 March 2004 and 7-11 March 2005; issued 22 July 2005.
http://www.un.org/docs/ecosoc/documents/2005/resolutions/Resolution%202005-25.pdf



1
Austria
115.7151
53
Rep. of Korea
2.0304
105
Mexico
0.1957
2
Canada
64.1751
54
Tunisia
1.9579
106
Azerbaijan
0.1810
3
Denmark
63.0390
55
Ukraine
1.8003
107
Turkey
0.1785
4
Australia
55.9482
56
Latvia
1.7505
108
Dominica
0.1714
5
New Zealand
54.8074
57
Bahamas
1.3943
109
Ecuador
0.1615
6
United States of America
48.8145
58
Jamaica
1.3806
110
Grenada
0.1584
7
Iceland
43.9204
59
Malaysia
1.3013
111
Mauritius
0.1521
8
France
41.8355
60
Macao
1.2809
112
Turkmenistan
0.1443
9
Norway
35.4423
61
Singapore
1.2174
113
Swaziland
0.1437
10
Sweden
28.4913
62
Lebanon
1.1213
114
Kenya
0.1400
11
Switzerland
26.5509
63
Argentina
1.0753
115
Wallis & Futuna Islands
0.1333
12
Falkland Islands
22.6667
64
Republic of Moldova
0.8212
116
Syrian Arab Republic
0.1244
13
United Kingdom
19.1548
65
Bahrain
0.7344
117
Vanuatu
0.1238
14
Netherlands
17.8260
66
Oman
0.7175
118
Chad
0.1197
15
Germany
16.0119
67
United Arab Emirates
0.7053
119
Colombia
0.1176
16
Saint Helena
13.2000
68
Panama
0.6261
120
Morocco
0.1153
17
Ireland
12.8478
69
Greece
0.6068
121
Kyrgyzstan
0.1111
18
Gibraltar
12.2069
70
Zimbabwe
0.5718
122
Viet Nam
0.0993
19
Spain
11.8115
71
Belarus
0.5606
123
Anguilla
0.0833
20
Belgium
10.4698
72
Mongolia
0.5511
124
Nauru
0.0833
21
Portugal
7.9790
73
Thailand
0.5421
125
Uzbekistan
0.0713
22
Poland
6.1887
74
Paraguay
0.5353
126
Zambia
0.0704
23
Czech Republic
5.7657
75
Botswana
0.5200
127
Mali
0.0665
24
New Caledonia
5.6591
76
Brunei Darussalam
0.5200
128
Egypt
0.0588
25
Finland
5.4013
77
Jordan
0.4981
129
Algeria
0.0546
26
Italy
5.3206
78
Dominican republic
0.4752
130
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
0.0527
27
Israel
5.0158
79
Kazakhstan
0.4727
131
Marshall Islands
0.0526
28
Bulgaria
4.9697
80
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
0.4500
132
Bolivia
0.0524
29
French Polynesia
4.9069
81
Saudi Arabia
0.4463
133
Bhutan
0.0461
30
Japan
4.7174
82
Bosnia & Herzegovina
0.4332
134
Guatemala
0.0333
31
South Africa
4.6682
83
Sri Lanka
0.4248
135
Myanmar
0.0327
32
Estonia
4.5458
84
Peru
0.4163
136
Cape Verde
0.0217
33
Form. Yug. Rep. of Macedonia
4.3582
85
Uganda
0.4001
137
Indonesia
0.0180
34
Slovenia
4.3210
86
Cook Islands
0.3889
138
Senegal
0.0157
35
Slovakia
4.3185
87
Tonga
0.3861
139
Rwanda
0.0136
36
Barbados
3.8044
88
Republic of Palau
0.3500
140
Nepal
0.0126
37
Hong Kong SAR
3.4817
89
Qatar
0.3380
141
Benin
0.0112
38
Uruguay
3.3350
90
Kuwait
0.3376
142
Yemen
0.0100
39
Malta
3.2581
91
Montserrat
0.3333
143
Cambodia
0.0098
40
Costa Rica
3.2375
92
Nicaragua
0.3280
144
Burundi
0.0080
41
Brazil
3.0848
93
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
0.3277
145
Cameroon
0.0076
42
Andorra
3.0000
94
United Republic of Tanzania
0.3250
146
Sao Tome & Principe
0.0065
43
Namibia
2.8653
95
China
0.3221
147
Central African Republic
0.0048
44
Georgia
2.7498
96
British Virgin Islands
0.3182
148
Côte d’Ivoire
0.0032
45
Cyprus
2.7115
97
Saint Vincent & the Grenadines
0.2963
149
Dem. Rep. of the Congo
0.0031
46
Seychelles
2.6627
98
Venezuela
0.2961
150
Sierra Leone
0.0028
47
Hungary
2.5857
99
Russian Federation
0.2807
151
Eritrea
0.0021
48
Lithuania
2.4867
100
Guinea-Bissau
0.2368
152
Burkina Faso
0.0016
49
Chile
2.4758
101
El Salvador
0.2303
153
Pakistan
0.0013
50
Romania
2.4616
102
Turks & Caicos Islands
0.2273
154
Guinea
0.0011
51
Serbia & Montenegro
2.0794
103
Suriname
0.2183
155
Mozambique
0.0006
52
Netherlands Antilles
2.0447
104
Philippines
0.2182



Table 1. Global Morphine Consumption, 2004 (mg/capita). Note: Countries not listed did not report morphine consumption to the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) for 2004. Source: INCB; United Nations Demographic Yearbook.


 NETWORK Home
  Guest Editorial
 
Palliative Care: A Global Imperative

  Articles
 
Oncology, Pain Relief and Government

Opioid Availability: one Patient’s Perspective

Psychosocial Care: an Important Element of Palliative Care

INCTR’s Palliative Access (PAX) Program

  Reports
 
INCTR’s Clinical Guidelines for Palliative Care

The Challenge of Palliative Care Development in Nepal

A South Indian Palliative Care Initiative: An Eventful Year in Hyderabad in Nepal

Scaling up Palliative Care Services Across Government Hospitals in Tanzania

Partner Profiles
 
Partner Institutions in Nepal

  Profile in Cancer Medicine
 

African Solutions for African Problems


Copyright © 2008 The International Network For Cancer Treatment and Research